Ok this seems too harsh. At the very least either make the penalty a -10 with a reset or not a reset because I can't imagine the amount of drama that could happen if someone accidentally uses a shock glider after habitually selecting it for a few years now (myself included). You might as well...
Isn't it more of a headache to worry about changing previous acronyms that have already been established for a year already? I personally would be fine with 5 letter acronyms if it means that I don't have to change them later and relearn everything all again.
Another gain that I see is that it...
Personally, I actually don't see the issue with a cup being entirely rainbow roads when it comes to naming conventions. Take for instance RR MKWii, RR MK7, RR GBA, and RR DD are all released for booster pack 4. We can then put something like...
b4RRw
b4RR7
b4RRg
b4RRd
Of course, these acronyms...
Everyone (including toadbot) matters in this conversation. Most of us (time trialers especially) don't use toadbot when describing what track we're talking about in conversations. I'm all for any other alternatives, but at this point, with 48 new tracks in 6 waves, it's going to be a nightmare...
Honestly why not just have prefixes based on pack waves?
ex:
b1PP - Paris Promenade (Booster Wave 1 Track)
b2WC - Wario's Colosseum (Booster Wave 2 Track please for the love of god put this in)
I feel like most of the conflict here is the fact that we'll have 48 new tracks with potentially...