[A13] ζten 572 - 402 Mandarina de Schrödinger ✓

[imasara]

GG

Spoiler: Screenshot

 

[Babou]

d. Players must use a Mii name which makes them easily recognizable as their alias on the MKCentral registry. Failure to do so will result in a -10 (-7 in a 5v5) points penalty for the match.

L is not a valid name, so it's -10 for Zten
Final result is Zten 572 - 402 M$

 

[imasara]

d. Players must use a Mii name which makes them easily recognizable as their alias on the MKCentral registry. Failure to do so will result in a -10 (-7 in a 5v5) points penalty for the match.

L is not a valid name, so it's -10 for Zten
Final result is Zten 572 - 402 M$

While we respect the decision made by MKU staff, we wonder how is it determined as not valid? On our team registry, lincw is the only player that starts with an L, wouldn't this be considered recognizable? We played Amplify IV earlier, where the amplify rule specifies that

Players must use a Mii name which makes them easily recognizable as their alias on the MKCentral registry.

1. Name abbreviations of 2 or more letters are permitted as long as they are not easily confused with another member of the same team

while the current MKU rule does not give the minimal number of characters required for a valid name. So it is a bit confusing to us and we would like to hear more from the staff about how to determine if a mii name is valid or not.

Anyway, we will try to be more careful and make names more recognizable and we appreciate the work done by the staff.

 

[Nato]

While we respect the decision made by MKU staff, we wonder how is it determined as not valid? On our team registry, lincw is the only player that starts with an L, wouldn't this be considered recognizable? We played Amplify IV earlier, where the amplify rule specifies that

while the current MKU rule does not give the minimal number of characters required for a valid name. So it is a bit confusing to us and we would like to hear more from the staff about how to determine if a mii name is valid or not.

Anyway, we will try to be more careful and make names more recognizable and we appreciate the work done by the staff.

So say for example "Soldier" is the person thats warring

TAG*Soldier wouldn't fit so...

- TAG* Sold
- TAG*Soldi

These two would be fine, but...

- TAG* S could be realistically anyone that starts with an S.. so it isn't completely 100% clear who the person is, if that makes sense to you?